M The New York Art World ®"All You Need To Know."
M The New York Art World ®"All You Need To Know."
 

art reviews

 

 

     

    Richard Serra
    Guggenheim Museum Bilbao
    >>
    By Lily Faust

    Susan Taylor Glasgow, Miles Van Ransselaer
    Heller Gallery
    >>
    By Joel Simpson

    Damian Aquiles
    Heidi Cho Gallery
    >>
    By Nicollette Ramirez

    Philip Argent and Amelie Chabannes
    LUXE Gallery
    >>
    By Mary Hrbacek

    Amaya Bozal and Laura Harrison
    Paul Sharpe Contemporary Art
    >>
    By Julia Morton

    Shazia Sikander
    Brent Sikkema >>

    By Gu Huihui

    Thomas Struth
    Marian Goodman Gallery
    >>
    By Jessica D. K. PARK

    Yigal Ozeri
    Mike Weiss Gallery
    >>
    By Mary Hrbacek

    Max Ernst
    The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    >>
    By Julia Morton

    Gregory Colbert: Ashes and Snow
    Nomadic Museum
    >>
    By Joel Simpson

    Tim Hawkinson
    Whitney Museum of American Art
    >>
    By Jari Chevalier


    The Inner Eye
    Interart Gallery
    >>
    By Julia Morton

     

                  


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Richard Serra
    Guggenheim Museum Bilbao

    By Lily Faust

    On June 8, 2005, Richard Serra’s permanent installation, The Matter of Time, will open to the public in its permanent location at the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao in Spain. Billed as the largest site-specific sculptural commission in modern history, the work consists of seven new massive sculptures and an existing work, Snake, which was commissioned in 1996, and completed in 1997, in time for Guggenheim Museum Bilbao’s inaugural show. Richard Serra’s commission is the culmination of a 35-year relationship between the artist and the Guggenheim, said Thomas Krens, Director of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation.
    The Matter of Time appears to summarize Serra’s approach to sculpture, underlining the tense geometry of his earlier work, Torqued Ellipses. In accord with the artist’s oeuvre, it is BIG. Made of weatherproof steel, the total weight of The Matter of Time is 1,034 tons. Its height varies from 13 to 14 feet, and the combined length of the eight sculptures reaches 370 feet. They are arranged in the Guggenheim’s 430-foot long Arcelor Gallery, named after the sponsor, Arcelor, a global steel company. Like Serra’s controversial Tilted Arc, which stood at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan for eight years, each piece is physically arresting, and foreboding. The intense physicality of Serra’s sculptures can produce a psychological thrill, or anxiety, depending on the viewer’s state of mind. Snake,with its three ess-shaped steel forms, establishes the vertical rhythm of the layout, surrounded by the spiral and elliptical configurations of the other pieces on each end. The spatial relationships of inner/outer, open/closed engender sensations of confinement and liberation, depending on one’s proximity to the massive geography of the work.
    Since its opening in October 1997, the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao has been steadily expanding its permanent collection, focusing on post-World War II art. In the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao, architect Frank Gehry has created a structure that is both sculptural and functional, a voluminous art “vault” to contain and exhibit art. Architecturally, the museum is airy and playful, with gravity defying arcs that give a sense of undulating space. Its telltale roof is an ensemble of baroquely twisting planes, covered in light-reflecting titanium. The contrast between Gehry’s lofty interior and exterior, and Richard Serra’s gravity pinned, massive curves of steel should no doubt give the museum visitor intimations of relativity, and an appreciation for the Platonic order. In The Matter of Time Serra appears to be reaching for the tangible, material evidence of time by creating fields of time around weights of steel, relating them to the floor, ceiling and walls of a museum designed to foster the illusion of weightlessness.
    Through 4/23. ¶



     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Susan Taylor Glasgow, Miles Van Ransselaer
    Heller Gallery

    By Joel Simpson

    Glass sculpture is an enormously diverse medium; its inherent aesthetic appeal can, to the uninitiated, obscure the artistic expression of the work. The viewer is often as impressed with the ingenuity of the artist’s novel use of glass, as much as the thematics of the works. This is especially true of these three artists.
    Susan Taylor Glasgow, a former seamstress, applies her needle work to glass, stitching parts together with waxed linen thread to construct familiar kitchen objects — tea pots, coffee cups, toasters and vases. Upon these she has emblazoned 1950s style glamour figures in various states of undress, many evoking the look of “Maidenform bra” ads of the era. Titled Domesticity Gone Awry Glasgow, the work targets her own ambivalence towards domesticity in the period in which she came of age. Messages on the pieces are excerpts from the kind of cheerful ad copy that presumed domestic tasks and man-pleasing to be the ultimate in fulfillment: “I’m so lucky,” “just right,” “glamourous lift.” The comic-book dot-matrix shading of the figures reinforces their ironic articificiality, and the doily and lace patterns artfully sandblasted on the backgrounds complete the presentation. These pieces reveal the culture of female constraint in graceful and incongruous new ways, that was dominant during baby-boomers’ childhoods.
    The next room of the gallery featured Miles Van Ransselaer’s series of bronze hands protruding from the walls, kneading dripping blobs of slumped clear glass, each one frozen in mid-drip, some of which reach down to the floor where they virtually puddle. Entitled Grasping the Intangible, the work is really less about this metaphysical subject than it is about the incongruity of hand-squishing a gooey mass that happens to be clear and pristine. The effect is fascinating; one yearns to get one’s own hands into it.
    Finally, some of the brilliant minimalist works of Nicole Chesney still hung in the last room in the gallery, though her show closed in March. On rectangular pieces of sanded glass, many of them in combination, Chesney has painted gradually shifting color. The reference is explicitly to sky and water, and she pays overt tribute to French philosopher Gaston Bachelard, who wrote on the poetics of space. Dramatic in their contrasts but subtle in their shifts from color to color, the pieces are powerfully calming. In the outstanding one of the series, a dyptich, near blackness on top and bottom converges through blues toward the gap between two pieces, which is framed in brilliant light grey. The effect is mesmerizing.
    Through 5/1. ¶

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Damian Aquiles
    Heidi Cho Gallery

    By Nicollette Ramirez

    Cuban born Damian Aquiles incorporates found objects from the streets of Havana and the Cuban countryside into his work. For example, Havana Club, a circular piece made of burnt transport paper from rum labels, is mounted to form a circle on the canvas, and as the burnt edges of these labels form the outer circumference they seem to be floating off into space. It is a mandala of sorts, a symbol of a disintegrating/reassembling world.
    Other found objects include discarded paint cans, oil cans, signs and windows.
    In Si dejo de Sonar… (2004-2005), white letters cut out of metal spell out a poem. All of the text is written by Aquiles himself. The white metal letters have rusted onto the white canvas, and the rust color, both around the letters and dripping down the canvas, add another dimension to the words and the work. The piece, Todo el parte… (2004-2005), ironically has the warning "flammable" in cool, blue text repeated on the flattened metal cans at the bottom of the work, while the top half is burnt out black.
    A collage of product names recalls Warhol’s Pop Art in Untitled (2004-2005), which is composed of metal from paint cans, motor oil cans and other cans not so easily identifiable, flattened and mounted on wood. Adding texture and shadowing to this work are the drips of paint, both imposed by the artist as well as those that had already dried on the paint cans. The burnt edges of the cans seem both "natural" and contrived; much like the state of Cuba today.
    Through 5/7.¶

     

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Philip Argent and Amelie Chabannes
    LUXE Gallery

    By Mary Hrbacek

    Philip Argent's new series of abstract landscapes synthesizes pop cultural influences, design elements and the spatial breadth of authentic landscape space into one idea. Inspired by a wide sample of graphic materials combined with remembered, observed experiences, the artist re-constructs visual information into lushly mottled layers overlaid by fields of white round-edged forms that hint at clouds seen from above. These simple shapes suggest cartoon thought-bubbles which, upon closer inspection, work as flat abstract cloud formations. The feeling of air and deep pictorial space is subtly enhanced by diverse rectangular "envelopes" set within the format's upper regions. This artist skillfully plays with infinite variations on a theme. These "windows" echo the larger frame, but seem more visually distant, suggesting a road map. They add an unexpected perspective, partially flattening the image at the same time as it creates the possibility of a layered spatial interpretation.
    Although these paintings are machine-mediated, the final works are hand-painted. Argent employs rich, warm orange hues, purple-pinks and sky blue colors in flat biomorphic shapes punctuated with round-edged black forms that function as details. Overlapping segments, each with varied and softly mixed textures, can be seen peeking through from beneath the flat colored shape, yielding a feeling of spatial dimensionality. The pieces evoke a playful sense of airy, elegant lightness, while the computer mediation adds a new contemporary vision.
    In the gallery’s project space, Amelie Chabannes' colorful fantasy based semi-abstract drawings on paper combine the technique of automatic drawing with oblique references to the history of the Crusades and their lingering effect on Europe today. The artist taps into unconscious impulses that fuel her affinity for tangled lines, biomorphic shapes, and plant and insect forms which intermingle with fairy tale elements; emerging from a dream-like reverie. The resulting rapidograph drawings are imaginative, skillfully rendered works that display strong graphic elements defined by a white ground, pure colors and stem-like lines.
    Her aesthetic vocabulary includes small dots, miniscule bubbles, tiny branches with emerging buds, mushrooms, and black sea creatures. Yellow-green, red, pale gray, mint, black and white interact in crisp, fresh color relationships. Sometimes a tiny reclining figure makes an appearance. The subtly erotic forms and Id-inspired elements seem to squirm and undulate, activated by snarled lines and sea anemone-like forms with small hairs or bristles. Countless tiny legs move across portions of the drawings' surfaces, with rope-like elements suggestive of bodily orifices and black specks that resemble a swarm of buzzing gnats.
    In a recent series of photographs, also included here, Chabannes documents the vestiges of scarred topology in the famous battlefields of Verdun, inflicted in World War I. She has subsequently altered the pictures, cutting out portions and drawing over the surfaces with a mass of curvilinear lines. The works are intended to represent a personal autobiography.
    Imaginative, obsessive and playful, these works add a unique context to Argent's landscapes. Chabannes has established an unmistakable, personal stamp that is singularly original.
    Through 5/14. ¶

     

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Amaya Bozal and Laura Harrison
    Paul Sharpe Contemporary Art

    By Julia Morton

    Movement best defines Laura Harrison’s new paintings of brick walls featured in Contexture, a double solo exhibition of Harrison, and Spanish artist Amaya Bozal.
    Harrison’s pictures move us through space and time. In a loose series of six thematic paintings, we zoom in, painting by painting, from a distant exterior, to a magnified detail on an interior wall. Though her paintings are hung randomly throughout the gallery space, a time sequence emerges as one wanders through them. Starting with Ellis (2005), a medium-sized canvas, which features a softly-colored, roughly drawn brick wall, we also see the wall, however, Harrison’s 2003 drawing Ellis Island.
    The next painting Oriental Wallpaper #2, moves us back "inside," as the two-dimensional canvas depicts a dilapidated plaster wall with a piece of printed wallpaper still attached. Other paintings follow this theme, zooming in closer to study the graphic elements of the decorative paper prints.
    There are several paths to take at this point in Harrison’s series. One can go next to her subtle landscape, My Parent’s Wallpaper, or to the surprising figurative work Kimono, or to the colorful abstract Stripes. The work transcends ordinary nostalgia by allowing clear but varied interpretations. We see the artist’s jitters here and there in overwrought strokes; but her lyrical breakthroughs help to balance the presentation.
    Bricks are an effective contemporary motif, symbolizing structure and sanctuary. Harrison’s soft-edge color and relief textures flatten easily into pure abstract patterns. In Blue Bricks, she does away with the solidity of her walls, as the bricks loose their mortar and become cloud-like dashes. Casually painted, they float across the large horizontal canvas above a blurry mix of color.
    Amaya Bozal’s eight nude female torsos, painted in earthy flesh tones splashed with blood red paint, offer a contrast to Harrison’s brick motif. Seen against white or black grounds, the watery figures are gripped in strokes of thick encaustic. As a vehicle to provide some framework to showing both artists’ work together, while stopping short of a group show, Contexture offers a modest showcase for the talents of these two young artists.
    Through 5/7. ¶

     

     

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article


    Shazia Sikander
    Brent Sikkema

    By Gu Huihui

    Shazia Sikander continues her appropriation of Indo-Persian miniature art in this recent solo show; moving beyond seeing this as a vehicle for narrative art - instead of merely contemporizing this ancient tradition within its traditional framework – it becomes raw material for formal and meditative extrapolations. If not always successful, at least one feels the artist is really challenging herself by pushing the work on both formal and ideological grounds. Her scope has expanded, becoming more cosmological. In an art market where commercial pressures make it increasingly difficult for artists to take chances, to develop new ideas, this exhibition is like a breath of fresh air.
    How much more of a treat, then, that the work is not only innovative, but also very good. The best of the work, like the ancient models that they draw upon, are these exquisite, delicate worlds. The exhibition is broken down into four sections: a series of small, graphite on paper entitled 51 Ways of Looking; a set of large-scaled gouache drawings on blush-colored paper; a series of small landscapes called Land Escapes; and a film, Pursuit Curve. While her film work confirms that there is more to filmmaking than holding artist credentials, her experimentation in the other three areas pays off; Sikander is clearly thinking about what illustration can do beyond telling a story.
    In 51 Ways of Looking, Ms. Sikander draws influence not only from miniature art but also from other sources, such as tantric drawings, calligraphy and geometric abstractions. A few of the drawings appear to have been taken directly from Emma Kunz’s abstractions (whose work is serendipitously showing at the Drawing Center in Soho). These elements, though at times explicit, begin to lose their historical framework and settle into formal abstractions. In one untitled piece, a dark organic form, filled in with dark graphite, floats obliquely against the upper left corner of the white paper. It appears, like many of the others in this series, as a mysterious, contemplative shape. A closer look, however, reveals the distinct outline of a lion; this figurative aspect pulls the work back into the world of illustration and the cognitive process of language. Yet the drawing refuses to become anchored to that identity and soon returns to being a meditative form, rather than a narrative vehicle. The drawing hovers constantly between being the abstract and the figurative.
    While 51 Ways of Looking was mostly restricted to black and white (although the Emma-Kunz-like drawings did employ colored pencils) the next series of small works, Land Escapes, shows Ms. Sikander doing what she knows best: small-scaled colored works on paper. This is the strongest work in the exhibition. In some ways, despite the free, expressive brushwork and the absence of any narrative, the gouache drawings on paper can be seen as a direct heir to traditional miniature art in its sumptuous jewel-toned colors and the use of white opaque line overlays in the the landscape. This is particularly evident in Land Escape, Series 3, No. 8. Each presents itself as an entire universe within a small space.

    The larger drawings, ironically, feel much more confined and constricted. Perhaps the scale still feels awkward for Ms. Sikander, for the placement of the forms are a bit arbitrary and not all the space on the paper is activated. Still, the drawings are delicate and sensitive. Most importantly here we see the line – the vehicle for narration – literally unraveling. Although Ms. Sikander may still be grappling with issues, it is more exciting to actively follow the development of a thoughtful artist, than to be present only at the end of an artist’s career, when everything has presumably been solved.
    Through 4/16. ¶

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Thomas Struth
    Marian Goodman Gallery

    By Jessica D. K. PARK

    These large-scale photographs and a video piece, by German photographer, Thomas struth, trace a direct relationship to the artist’s earlier work, the celebrated Museum series, in which he photographed historic architectural interiors, such as Milan Cathedral, San Zaccaria and Pantheon against the back-drop of contemporary tourist crowds. In the new work, titled Audience, Struth focuses attention on people viewing classical artworks, in this case, Michelangelo’s David at the Galleria dell’ Accademia in Florence. The actual sculpture is nowhere to be seen in the photographs, instead we are shown the reactions of crowds viewing the Renaissance masterpiece.
    Although the scale and general look of these photographs appear similar to the previous series, the viewer’s reactions differ greatly. The absence of the artwork (from our view) and the banal expressions of the spectators scuttle any lingering romantic ideals one might have had about these treasures from the past. In his Museum series the visitor is depicted looking away from the camera, so as to observe the environment, and we are left to imagine their experience. The large size of the photograph has the further effect of competing as a public art piece in its own right.
    The Audience series brings us back to everyday existence. Crowds of spectators are seen in mundane, ordinary gatherings. Struth presents his observation of contemporary people in relation to classic art without any romanticization or manipulation. His vision is deadpan, and he is careful not to allow the viewer to participate in the scene. For example, while the Museum series draws the viewer into the scene, here we can only observe the crowds, along with the artist.
    Struth’s video, Read This Like Seeing It For the First Time, does the same thing. He documents a series of classical music lessons conducted by the guitarist Frank Bungarten at the Lucerne Music Academy. While the instructor discusses details of musical pieces with one student, other students sit and listen to the session. Because the film is projected on two life-size screens, the viewer feels like one of the students listening to the lecture. Bungarten helps each student feel every part of the piece, and these ordinary looking teenage youngsters seem eager to understand the sophistication of the classical instrument. Struth’s camera calmly observes the contrast between the inexperienced students and the knowledgeable instructor, while the viewer bears silent witness to both the magical and the mundane
    Through 5/7. ¶

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Yigal Ozeri
    Mike Weiss Gallery

    By Mary Hrbacek

    These symbolic portraits hint at mythic archetypal legends, arousing speculation as to the identity, location and significance of each isolated subject. Paradoxically, the artist selectively appropriates enigmatic gestures and facial expressions from an art-historical roster that includes paintings by Leonardo Da Vinci and Caravaggio.
    Ozeri employs a highly figurative style without becoming "photorealistic." The artist establishes a relationship between the individual depicted and her environment in moody expressive images. The grand scale of the heads and facial features in these large paintings projects a heroic presence; sometimes the subjects appear to have been captured unawares in spontaneous poses. Warm skin and cool city tones coupled with carefully articulated forms emphasize the theme of human beings struggling against an impersonal outer world.
    Solitary figures, apparently preoccupied with emotional tensions, exist in dark isolated settings that serve as metaphors for inner feelings of bleakness and wariness. Yet these women are quite beautiful. In the painting, Crossing Arms, a young woman strikes a dance pose against a backdrop of white cloth, evoking the budding awareness of a girl's early sexual awakening. The white wall and drapery emphasize her purity.
    Stripped of any reference to nature, wearing neutral clothing, these portraits seem to suggest on some level that the individual should become her own hero, with autonomous reserves and self-referential resources. Unlike the portraits women by Ingres or even Renoir, clothing, interiors,and accouterments that hint at activities are absent. Ozeri’s mysterious women evoke a curious feeling of startling disquiet. The portraits Kate, Carrie and Elizabeth are more inwardly focussed than the other works. These women have fair to bronze skin tones that glow from within, accentuating a lively sense of presence, while the powerful painting, Medusa, depicts a black woman whose energy compels the viewer to stop and pay attention.
    There is a theatrical, cinematic component to this work that hints at dark undefined origins. All of these images elicit a feeling of timelessness, where the past converges seamlessly with the present.
    Through 4/30. ¶

     


     

    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Max Ernst
    The Metropolitan Museum of Art

    By Julia Morton

    During his life, Max Ernst got almost everything right; he was intelligent, talented, good-looking, and even lucky. Now, nearly thirty years after his death, one of the twenty-century’s most celebrated artists, Max Ernst commands surprisingly little attention. Is it the artist’s fault, or does he simply need a new agent in the afterlife?
    Chronologically mapped out with plenty of masterpieces to salivate over, this exhibition of seventy-five of Ernst’s significant works seems lacking. While the show brings us his greatest hits, Max Ernst the man, his life and times, never fully materializes.
    In the first gallery we learn about a young art student who is sent off to war, serving on Germany’s Eastern and Western fronts. Surviving the First World War, Ernst restarted his career, aligning himself with the Dadaist movement. Painted in 1921, Oedipus Rex, with its tortured ritual, gives expression to the movement’s best intentions to replace reason with freedom.
    The second gallery places us in Paris. The art displayed is from the mid-1920s, and Ernst is now a Surrealist exploring his sexuality with writer and poet Paul Éluard, and his wife Gala. In Castor and Pollution, done in 1923, we see two young men sitting back to back in an odd round tub/boat. Flatly painted, like an advertisement, the image tingles and menaces with unanswered questions. Flagrant, yet camouflaged, this homoerotic picture is a good example of Ernst’s clever use of contrast and surprise.
    In his large painting, The Virgin spanking the Christ child before three witnesses, Ernst’s art takes on the Surrealists pet issues; authority, the church and art history. We see the full range of media, the "collage novels," metal sculptures, photo collages by Ernst’s alter-ego Loplop, and, of course, dozens of paintings created using Ernst’s invented surface techniques; including, frottage, grattage and decalcomania.
    As we wander out of the 1920s and into the 1930s we learn that Ernst has married a French girl, his paintings are selling, and then suddenly he finds himself black-listed by the new power in Germany, the Nazis. Ernst’s swirling, jutting, ghoulish paintings unwittingly document the decade long march to war. His 1937 Fireside Angle, with its strutting monster, effectively unmasks the power-that-be.
    The Robing of the Bride was done in 1940, and shows a strange half bird woman being covered-up and escorted away by armed guards. Heavily textured, and baroquely colored, the work symbolizes Ernst’s escape from Europe with the help of his new bride, American heiress Peggy Guggenheim.
    Mid-way through the exhibition there is a seating area where the show’s catalog is displayed, along with a few poster-sized photographs. We see Ernst working as a young painter, and decades later relaxing with painter Dorothea Tanning; the last of his many wives. The biographical information is sketchy, however, as if presented here as an afterthought. For example, there are no personal objects, letters or photographs that might have given context to Ernst’s work. But the work itself, in almost any form of presentation, is certainly worth seeing.
    Through 7/10. ¶

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Gregory Colbert: Ashes and Snow
    Nomadic Museum

    By Joel Simpson

    Ten years in the making, Ashes and Snow, which first opened in Venice’s Arsenale in 1992, arrived in New York last month; the self-contained Nomadic Museum will remain at pier 54 (13th Street) in Manhattan until June 6. The highly ambitious show has attracted enormous crowds, and it’s not hard to see why.
    The show’s 81 sepia prints on Japanese rice paper and a slow-motion video of the same scenes, has enormous visual appeal. The Nomadic Museum, which dismantles completely, is a narrow pier with a 60-foot high ceiling and dramatic lighting that evokes a New Age minimalist secular, spiritual cathedral. The images and video feature beautiful exotic south Asian and African models, sensuously interacting with a range of animals, including elephants, zebras, cheetahs, eagles, elands and whales. Water plays a big part. Much of the human-elephant interactions are in knee-deep lakes or waist deep pools. Some of it is spectacularly in deep water, with the elephant paddling overhead, and the sleek young man careering beneath.
    We also treated to the image of a young woman, her eyes closed and head thrown back in presumed rapture, in water up to her waist, who is caressed by an elephant’s trunk, then two elephants’ trunks. Elsewhere a young man seems to lead four elephants standing in a lake in prayer, and a child sleeps in shallow water and is showered by an elephant. The elephants’ rich dermal folds contrast with the fresh human skin, as it resonates with wave patterns in the water. Continuing, a young woman sits on ancient steps as an eagle flies overhead toward the viewer; she walks through the broad sunlit columns of an austere temple and the eagle flies over her again. In another series, young Africans sit with cheetahs, as all gaze serenely in different directions. Two gorgeous young men dance with whales. Finally, the erotic subtext becomes explicit, as a young couple cavorts in silhouette under water, dressed only in dhotis, leaving her breasts exposed.
    We seem to be in a dream world, but who is doing the dreaming? One feels an unease looking at these photographs, stripped of any historical or social context, yet presenting animals and human types from complex, rich and tormented cultures.
    While the work is stunning, the premise for the show is a bit overworked. Indeed, taking the artist at his word, it seems that Colbert intends to single-handedly universalize the mythic force of these animals (using exotic looking models for a Western audience), so as to “lift the natural and artificial barriers between humans and other species, dissolving the distance that exists between them.” Okay. But do these exotic actors in dhotis represent “modern man,” the humans in relation to whom the natural and artificial barriers from animals have been dissolved?
    Colbert’s project literally defines the dangers of aestheticization — the appropriation of images from remote cultures to nourish Western fantasies of escape, spiritual powers and sexual liberation. As such, the work here represents a New Age version of Nineteenth Century orientalism, with a zoological twist. These issues notwithstanding, Ashes and Snow remains an extraordinary technological and aesthetic achievement.
    Through 6/6. ¶

    Ed Note: Nomadic Museum is located at Hudson River Park Pier 54 @ West 13th Street, New York. www.ashesandsnow.org. Hrs Tue-Thu 11-7, Fri-Sat 11-8, Sun 12-5.


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    Tim Hawkinson
    Whitney Museum of American Art

    By Jari Chevalier

    This retrospective of Hawkinson’s career reveals a prolific Renaissance man, with a dark, wry sense of humor, whose conceptions demand fastidious precision in painting, drawing, sculpting, machine building, photomontage, collage and even clock-making.
    From a steady stream of Hawkinson’s self-portraits comes Humongulous, an anatomical cartography project for which he drew a grid on his body and mapped all the skin surfaces visible to him onto a larger grid on paper. The result is a precisely rendered painting — accurate, yet humorously distorted.
    Humongulous pairs well with Blindspot, which Hawkinson has explored in several iterations. It is a form resembling a fish made up of photographs taken of the body parts that he cannot see without a mirror, from the top of his head to his anus.
    In the sculptures and machines, philosophy is contextualized by absurdity. Drip, one of his handmade machines, is a tentacled creature made of twisted polyethylene and nozzles, suspended from the ceiling. Vaguely reminiscent of the exposed Wizard of Oz, its mechanical conductor is a workbench contraption that causes the creature to drip water in precise rhythms into tin buckets placed beneath its nozzles on the floor.
    Signature is a machine attached to an old school desk-chair combo that endlessly cranks out Tim Hawkinson’s name in a jerky cursive. Emoter, uses the random patterns of darkness on a television screen to determine the movements of Hawkinson’s facial features in a mechanized photographic self-portrait.
    Hawkinson draws upon his body for both subject matter and actual materials for building his works. Bird, for instance, is a delicate bird skeleton fashioned entirely from Hawkinson’s fingernail parings. He has also made a cracked bird’s egg out of his ground fingernails, hair and superglue.
    In another body-project, Hawkinson rigs a camera overhead to photograph his body at regular intervals as he lay in a bathtub gradually filling with black paint. He later cuts out the stacked strata of the body remaining in view in each shot. He builds up a topographical stack of these remaining parts in Drain and Plug, beside the corresponding bathtub stack that reveals the topographical depressions. A large drawing, Bathtub-Generated Contour Lace, and a formidable sculpture, Pentecost, are also based on this experiment.
    Pentecost employs life-sized figures, striated like geologic rock and positioned in an oversized tree of hollow tubes. These figures that seem to be listening through the tubes tap programmed rhythms to each other with a mechanical knee, hand, or forehead, as if communicating.
    One of Hawkinson’s singular works is a giant blown-out tire, named for its resemblance to Donatello’s sculpture of Mary Magdalene. Titling it Magdalene suggests a moral dimension that turns the blow-out into a metaphor of epic proportions.
    Sigmund Freud said of Leonardo that he was like a man who awoke too early in the darkness, while the others were all still asleep. The same might be said for Tim Hawkinson.
    Through 5/29. ¶

     


    e-mailE-Mail This Article

    The Inner Eye
    Interart Gallery

    By Julia Morton

    This group show of some eighteen artists, dubbed The Inner Eye, is a tour de force of contemporary surrealism, in all of its variations; magic realism and visionary Art. The artists presented here are members of the Society for Art of Imagination, a society formed in 1961 to give artists who work in this niche genre a support network.
    Heavy metal monsters are shown alongside fairy-like creatures, while science fiction landscapes complete with shiny geometric objects. Beautiful women float through a variety of dreamy as well as nightmarish scenes, and all manner of figures of one’s imagination seem to have been set loose . The works are intriguing, and skillfully rendered, though they tend to illustrate specific stories, rather lave the door open to entirely new inspirations. In Europe, especially in Russia, fantasy is an established art form, whereas in the United this particular style has generally fallen out of favor with the fine art crowd since the late 1940s. Like the premature declarations that painting is dead, however, new artist continually emerge to prove the critics wrong. Several exhibitions honoring early surrealist masters are in fact garnering attention today; there is the Max Ernst show at the Met, Surrealism U.S.A. at the National Academy, and a show about Salvador Dali at the Philadelphia Museum of Arts.
    Moreover, contemporary culture magazines such as San Francisco’s Juxtapoz regularly highlight artists inspired by dreams and spirituality. But here in New York, the predominance of conceptual art tends to relegate much of the artworks featured here to the Outsider Art category.
    To be sure, mystery and symbolism are vital elements in contemporary art, but they are not the foundation. The Society’s artists rely on classical compositions, traditional body and monster types, while letting prescribed narratives to do their heavy lifting. As a result, some of the work can become predictable at times. Gail Potocki’s Eve, is the show’s exception, however, in that we see a portrait of a woman who is both repellent and seductive; leaving the door open to interpretation. And it is this open-ended gaze into the unforeseen that informs the imagination.
    Through 5/7. ¶

     

    e-mailE-Mail This Article

     

 


 
 

Copyright © 2005- by MBM Publications/The New York Art World®. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder.